The idea

“SatsFact — BRC-20 Trust Infrastructure The problem nobody talks about BRC-20 tokens have no canonical state. There is no smart contract. No on-chain enforcer. The "truth" of who owns what exists only inside three independent databases maintained by Hiro, Unisat, and BestInSlot — and they disagree more often than the market knows. In 2023–2024, traders bought tokens on exchanges running one indexer, withdrew to wallets backed by another, and watched their balance disappear. Not a hack. Not a rug. The indexers simply processed the same Bitcoin blocks differently and arrived at different ledgers. The tokens existed on one platform and didn't exist on another. This is not a solved problem. What SatsFact does Cross-references any BRC-20 token across all three major indexers and returns a single score: VERIFIED, PARTIAL, or SUSPECT. The score measures three things: Do the indexers agree on the token's state? (consensus factor — 50% weight) Is supply concentrated in a handful of wallets? (whale risk — 30%) Is there real trading activity relative to market cap? (activity ratio — 20%) One number. Actionable before you size a position. Who needs it BRC-20 traders doing due diligence before entering a position. A 2/3 consensus token is not the same risk as a 3/3 token. Right now there's no way to know without manually checking three different explorers. OTC desks and market makers quoting BRC-20 tokens. Consensus status directly affects settlement risk. A token that two indexers accept and one rejects creates real counterparty exposure. Payment processors accepting BRC-20 — specifically relevant to Bitcoin-native payment infrastructure. When a merchant receives a BRC-20 payment, which indexer does their processor trust? Does it match the sender's wallet? SatsFact sits in that verification flow as a pre-settlement check. Why now BRC-20 volume is below its 2023 peak but the infrastructure problem got worse, not better. Hiro deprecated their API in March 2026. The indexer landscape is actively consolidating and fragmenting simultaneously. New tokens still launch with contested histories. The window where this data is hardest to get and most needed is open. The SEO angle is also clear: "BRC-20 indexer disagreement" has essentially zero content coverage and high-intent search traffic from exactly the users who would pay for a reliable data feed. Business model Free tier: public score lookup, limited to featured tokens API access: per-query or monthly subscription for traders, desks, and integrators Payment processor integration: white-label verification endpoint for platforms accepting BRC-20 — SatsFact as a trust layer before settlement clears The Blockonomics relationship is the distribution angle. A Bitcoin payment processor already has the merchant relationships. Adding a BRC-20 verification step is a natural product extension, not a new sale. Where it is today Live at satsfact.com. Unisat indexer connected (real-time holder counts, mint progress, deploy data). CoinGecko market data live. BestInSlot pending approval — that's the key that enables actual consensus comparison. One working indexer is an explorer. Two is the product.”